Here’s one for the etymologically minded – at what point does a mindless killing spree become a massacre?
I guess I’m just old fashioned. See, to my mind it takes a lot of blood on the ground to make a massacre. The dictionary definition is “unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution for revenge or plunder”. You get the idea.
What prompted this ponder? Well, I was watching the news. I know, I know, not something I should do what with the aneurism and my temper and what not. But still, there I am, watching the news.
Now, I am not about to argue that a lone nut job opening fire with an automatic weapon in a crowd and thusly mowing down innocent bystanders isn’t bad. It’s a tragedy and it’s terrible and it shouldn’t happen and all that. But the body count was five dead when the screen announced it as a massacre with capital letters and all.
Why do I get stuck on something like that?
Well, see it works like this – hollowing out a word like massacre means that you actually belittle real massacres. The synonyms are “carnage, extermination, butchery, genocide”. Five dead is none of those things. I had this discussion with a couple of friends of mine – one of them was of the opinion that “no, five dead is just a regular Friday night in Mexico City” and the other offered no opinion other than the more sedate “you’re weird”, but that’s okay, I’m used to that. The estimated number of human casualties in Darfur in Sudan has been estimated somewhere between twenty thousand and several hundred thousand dead due to direct combat, starvation and disease caused by the conflict. The bit I saw on the news was, like I said, some random whackjob shooting up a shopping mall.
The news… well, the fall of man is of course directly connected to the amount of information we are subjected to daily, that’s hardly a new thought. This was the kind of random violence you can’t guard against, predict, or even pretend to be ready for. But all that does not a massacre make. It’s no less of an individual tragedy for each of the dead and their loved ones, but it’s still not anywhere near a massacre.
Bertold Brecht said it best;
What keeps mankind alive? The fact that millions
are daily tortured, stifled, punished, silenced and oppressed
Mankind can keep alive thanks to its brilliance
in keeping its humanity repressed
And for once you must try not to shirk the facts
Mankind is kept alive
by bestial acts!
We need to take care where we put our words, irrespective of the fact that the signs are arbitrary, least the denotation starts drifting too far off course. We don’t only use words to describe our reality, we help define it through them. And they are at best slippery little things, so let’s not contribute to the the inherent instability of reality unnecessarily, shall we?
ROL
Recent Comments